14
!
42.
ro
I agree entirely with what is suggested by the 3rd Question. Where some Marine Lot Holders are willing and others unwilling to do the work, the willing former should do their part so far as their frontage, the Government doing the rest. Uniformity would be secured by the tendence of the Surveyor-General. As to the cheapness and quickness of the execution, I do not think that there would be any difference either way in this case.
In reply to the 18th Question, I should say that if the Surveyor-General has the means to commence the Bouliane Strand portion at once, it would be better to do so.
On the 5th Question I do not quite agree with the last witness. Large public wharves are necessary, but private wharves at the same time should be allowed. A prohibition of such private wharves would entail a great annoyance upon the Marine Lot Holders, who regard themselves entitled to some advantage in that character. Nearly every one of them has his private residence on his lot. If he was prevented from having his wharf in front of it, he would lose all the benefit he derives at present from that circumstance. Let them build their own private wharves as they please, so as not to interfere with the public wharves, as to which it might be well to be left to the Surveyor-General to decide in particular cases.
In addition to these observations, I think that the more extensive the public wharves, the greater will be their usefulness. They should be quite...
14
!
42.
ro
I agree entirely
tirely in what is suggested by the 3rd Question. Where some Marine Lot Holders
are willing and others uuwi
to do the
work, thie
the for
willing
former
a.d
should so their part sofar their frontage, the Government doing the rest . Uniformity
would be secured
the
by tendence of the Surveyor - General . As to the cheapness and quickness of the execution, I do not think that there
any difference either
would be
way
in this case.
In
reply to the 18th Question,
I should say that if the Surveyor
General has the mears to commence the Bouliane Strand portion at once, it would be
better to do so.
Ou the 5th Question I do not
with the last wittress.
quite agree
· Large public
wharves
احمد
327
are ne
necessary, but.
privote wharves at the same time should be allowed. A & prohibition of
such private wharves would entail
a
great annoyance upon the Marine Lot Holders, who regards themselves entitled to sou're advantage in
that character. Nearly every one of them
as
has his private residence on his lot.
private If he was prevented from having his wharf in front of it, be would lose all the benefit be derives at present from that circumstance. Let them build their own private wharves as they please, so as not to interfere with the public wharves, as to which
as to which it might
e
well be left to the Surveyor Genera Subject
to decide
dec particular cases.
to these observations Ithink that
the more
extend the public wharves the greater will be their
you
usefulness. They should be quite
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.